<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanning for Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/</link>
	<description>Change thrives on me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bisho</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>bisho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>I also like the idea of some Wireless networks being present all the time, even if they are not there. Perhaps a &quot;pinning&quot; list like new Tomboy (http://www.gnome.org/projects/tomboy/images/applet-small.png) could help to display always your more often used networks, and you could force the connection to one of them before scanning is finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the idea of some Wireless networks being present all the time, even if they are not there. Perhaps a &#8220;pinning&#8221; list like new Tomboy (<a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/tomboy/images/applet-small.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnome.org/projects/tomboy/images/applet-small.png</a>) could help to display always your more often used networks, and you could force the connection to one of them before scanning is finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Mena</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Mena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>I totally want this &quot;scanning for networks&quot; icon.

Also, could we clarify what the icons next to the signal-strength bars mean?  I have absolutely no idea what they mean, other than the &quot;locked&quot; icon which probably means &quot;you cannot use this network&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally want this &#8220;scanning for networks&#8221; icon.</p>
<p>Also, could we clarify what the icons next to the signal-strength bars mean?  I have absolutely no idea what they mean, other than the &#8220;locked&#8221; icon which probably means &#8220;you cannot use this network&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>Nice icon indeed. I would basically keep the normal icon and add this one on top or next to it.
I see myself scanning with my eyes through the taskbar for the NM icon I am used to, and if my eyes don&#039;t find it, that would probably make me re-scan the icons again.
So just add this nice image to the existing one somehow (tm)? Just my opinion. What do others think?

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice icon indeed. I would basically keep the normal icon and add this one on top or next to it.<br />
I see myself scanning with my eyes through the taskbar for the NM icon I am used to, and if my eyes don&#8217;t find it, that would probably make me re-scan the icons again.<br />
So just add this nice image to the existing one somehow &#8482;? Just my opinion. What do others think?</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>Definitely makes sense. I like your icons actually. The lack of feedback in the usage scenario you present, has made me angry a few times, especially since it liked to fail on connecting so much. Visual indicator of the wireless card scanning would be much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely makes sense. I like your icons actually. The lack of feedback in the usage scenario you present, has made me angry a few times, especially since it liked to fail on connecting so much. Visual indicator of the wireless card scanning would be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatal</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>fatal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Could we have some kind of spinning icon next to the &quot;Scanning for new networks&quot; to attract some attention as well maybe? Noticing that there&#039;s work in progress is imho always a bit easier if there&#039;s some motion....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could we have some kind of spinning icon next to the &#8220;Scanning for new networks&#8221; to attract some attention as well maybe? Noticing that there&#8217;s work in progress is imho always a bit easier if there&#8217;s some motion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo Zandi</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo Zandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>+1 user definitley needs to be informed when NM is scanning

NetworkManager is just great!

Matteo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 user definitley needs to be informed when NM is scanning</p>
<p>NetworkManager is just great!</p>
<p>Matteo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Bolsterlee</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Wouter Bolsterlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re at it: please merge the left click menu and the right click menu. It&#039;s very confusing since the &quot;master switches&quot; are in the right click menu and the network list is in the left click menu. Furthermore, to enable/disable a network the right click menu is used, and to enable a VPN connection the left click menu has to be used.

Keep up the good work; and please improve the menu interface (mumble something about beers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re at it: please merge the left click menu and the right click menu. It&#8217;s very confusing since the &#8220;master switches&#8221; are in the right click menu and the network list is in the left click menu. Furthermore, to enable/disable a network the right click menu is used, and to enable a VPN connection the left click menu has to be used.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work; and please improve the menu interface (mumble something about beers <img src='http://clarkbw.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg K Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg K Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>How about replacing the red “not found” overlay on the two-screen icon with another, static, overlay? A magnifying glass might work as “searching”, although it usually means “search” (as an imperative); I think a “reloading” symbol (probably the usual cycle of arrows) would work best, either static or animated. Personally, I&#039;d have no problem with animation, particularly if it&#039;s only a few-pixel overlay moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about replacing the red “not found” overlay on the two-screen icon with another, static, overlay? A magnifying glass might work as “searching”, although it usually means “search” (as an imperative); I think a “reloading” symbol (probably the usual cycle of arrows) would work best, either static or animated. Personally, I&#8217;d have no problem with animation, particularly if it&#8217;s only a few-pixel overlay moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Clark</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>Jay: NM is naturally going to scan for networks whenever it wakes up, however I can understand what you&#039;re saying.  You know where you are, it should just find it fast.  I bet there are some tricks that could be done to make the scan find your APs faster.  For instance if NM told the wireless card to search the channels / essids you connect to most first instead of going in numerical order you might get some speed up in finding your networks again.

Jon: You&#039;re right!  If the animation was subtle enough it might make sense, especially combined with what other are talking about using the [x] with the wireless icon to show that wireless is on but hasn&#039;t found anything and has stopped scanning.  

Thanks Steven!  It&#039;s one of my major complaints as well.

Karsten: good point about the tooltips as well!

anon: The applet list is supposed to update as NM finds new networks.  This is often a problem with drivers when you get a list populated at once instead of incrementally.

Steven: Give that icon a try!  Your work could only be better than mine :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay: NM is naturally going to scan for networks whenever it wakes up, however I can understand what you&#8217;re saying.  You know where you are, it should just find it fast.  I bet there are some tricks that could be done to make the scan find your APs faster.  For instance if NM told the wireless card to search the channels / essids you connect to most first instead of going in numerical order you might get some speed up in finding your networks again.</p>
<p>Jon: You&#8217;re right!  If the animation was subtle enough it might make sense, especially combined with what other are talking about using the [x] with the wireless icon to show that wireless is on but hasn&#8217;t found anything and has stopped scanning.  </p>
<p>Thanks Steven!  It&#8217;s one of my major complaints as well.</p>
<p>Karsten: good point about the tooltips as well!</p>
<p>anon: The applet list is supposed to update as NM finds new networks.  This is often a problem with drivers when you get a list populated at once instead of incrementally.</p>
<p>Steven: Give that icon a try!  Your work could only be better than mine <img src='http://clarkbw.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Brown</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>I think the &#039;searching&#039; icon should be consistent with other search metaphors within the desktop.  It could use something like the first icon, but instead of a red X, have a magnifying glass that circles around the area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8216;searching&#8217; icon should be consistent with other search metaphors within the desktop.  It could use something like the first icon, but instead of a red X, have a magnifying glass that circles around the area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>Would it be possible for the network-manager applet to update the list of available networks one network at a time while network-manager is still scanning? Populating the list as networks are discovered would give the impression that something is happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be possible for the network-manager applet to update the list of available networks one network at a time while network-manager is still scanning? Populating the list as networks are discovered would give the impression that something is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Corrales</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>David Corrales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a great idea. In fact, I&#039;ve been bothered a long time now with not being able to tell, just by looking at an icon, if my wireless is on or off.
To save battery, I turn my wireless on/off depending on where I am, and right now, I have to open a terminal and type &quot;iwconfig&quot; just to see if the radio is on. A scanning button would at least let me know about my nic&#039;s status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great idea. In fact, I&#8217;ve been bothered a long time now with not being able to tell, just by looking at an icon, if my wireless is on or off.<br />
To save battery, I turn my wireless on/off depending on where I am, and right now, I have to open a terminal and type &#8220;iwconfig&#8221; just to see if the radio is on. A scanning button would at least let me know about my nic&#8217;s status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karsten Wade</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Karsten Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>+1 to what you are thinking; feedback is definitely a key to the few things that ails NM.

One feature I use is the status bubble that appears when the mouse arrow hovers over nm-applet.  It is always refreshing the signal strength and seems faster or to show more subtlety than the stacked bars.  I use it when I am trying to find the best place to sit or position to face for maxium signal strength.  I can hover the mouse and watch the % update in real time as I move the laptop around for a better signal.

That hovering dialog would be a good place to display more information:

&quot;Scanning for networks&quot;

&quot;Found previous network &#039;Foo&#039;, attaching ...&quot;

&quot;Scanning for networks with &gt;20% strength&quot;

Again, from my experience, this hovering dialog is faster at refreshing than the fully opened nm-applet, so it is more useful for getting up-to-date information from the NetworkManager daemon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 to what you are thinking; feedback is definitely a key to the few things that ails NM.</p>
<p>One feature I use is the status bubble that appears when the mouse arrow hovers over nm-applet.  It is always refreshing the signal strength and seems faster or to show more subtlety than the stacked bars.  I use it when I am trying to find the best place to sit or position to face for maxium signal strength.  I can hover the mouse and watch the % update in real time as I move the laptop around for a better signal.</p>
<p>That hovering dialog would be a good place to display more information:</p>
<p>&#8220;Scanning for networks&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Found previous network &#8216;Foo&#8217;, attaching &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Scanning for networks with &gt;20% strength&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, from my experience, this hovering dialog is faster at refreshing than the fully opened nm-applet, so it is more useful for getting up-to-date information from the NetworkManager daemon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>I think the icon also needs to signify its still not connected to a network, still keep the red X on the bottom right. I think having the computer there with the radio waves slightly pulsating to signify activity would work perfectly there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the icon also needs to signify its still not connected to a network, still keep the red X on the bottom right. I think having the computer there with the radio waves slightly pulsating to signify activity would work perfectly there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Garrity</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Garrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>This makes great sense, Bryan. My primary issue with NetworkManager (which generally works well for me) so far is that there is no visual difference between &quot;I&#039;m looking for networks, give me a minute&quot;, and &quot;I&#039;m done looking for networks, there are none&quot;.

Nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes great sense, Bryan. My primary issue with NetworkManager (which generally works well for me) so far is that there is no visual difference between &#8220;I&#8217;m looking for networks, give me a minute&#8221;, and &#8220;I&#8217;m done looking for networks, there are none&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cooper</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be offended by a slightly pulsating orb at the top of the radio tower... in fact I think it would be more discoverable - subtle animation will suggest activity, while the icon itself will represent a scan of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be offended by a slightly pulsating orb at the top of the radio tower&#8230; in fact I think it would be more discoverable &#8211; subtle animation will suggest activity, while the icon itself will represent a scan of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Huie</title>
		<link>http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/17/scanning-for-feedback/#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Bryan,
I like the icon change but also think I&#039;d like the ability to tell NM some information to make it more efficient. i.e. if I&#039;m at home I&#039;m always going to connect to my AP and so I don&#039;t really want it to scan... 

I know that it will auto connect to the known network but what often happens is that it doesn&#039;t realize I&#039;m at home yet, and I obviously know I&#039;m there, so I feel the need to &quot;tell it&quot;, because I&#039;m naturally impatient and don&#039;t want to wait 30-60 seconds for it to realize my AP&#039;s there.

I&#039;m not sure how to solve that, or how it would change from a UI perspective, but I think if I had the option to do something dreaded like; right-click on NM and get a history list of access points, then I could just tell it straight away which to authenticate to, then I&#039;d feel like both it and I were making the best use of our time together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br />
I like the icon change but also think I&#8217;d like the ability to tell NM some information to make it more efficient. i.e. if I&#8217;m at home I&#8217;m always going to connect to my AP and so I don&#8217;t really want it to scan&#8230; </p>
<p>I know that it will auto connect to the known network but what often happens is that it doesn&#8217;t realize I&#8217;m at home yet, and I obviously know I&#8217;m there, so I feel the need to &#8220;tell it&#8221;, because I&#8217;m naturally impatient and don&#8217;t want to wait 30-60 seconds for it to realize my AP&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how to solve that, or how it would change from a UI perspective, but I think if I had the option to do something dreaded like; right-click on NM and get a history list of access points, then I could just tell it straight away which to authenticate to, then I&#8217;d feel like both it and I were making the best use of our time together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.310 seconds -->

